Members can sign in here.

About the Author

Andrew Burgess
Journalist and EU Blogger (Exmouth, United Kingdom)

European citizen with a well-used UK passport.

A graduate in French, Journalism and European Politics from universities in both France and the UK, I have spent time as an active member of the press corps in Brussels and Strasbourg at the European Parliament.

During what was a historic time for the EU with the introduction of the Lisbon Treaty, the UN climate change summit in Copenhagen and the financial troubles in the Eurozone, to name just a few, I attended the twice-monthly plenary sessions in Brussels and Strasbourg, as well as hearings on diverse subjects of interest, press conferences and numerous high-profile press points.

I regard meeting former Beatle Sir Paul McCartney, UEFA President Michel Platini, President of the European Parliament Jerzy Buzek and the High Representative for Foreign Affairs Baroness Ashton as particular highlights to date.

It would be an honour and an amazing opportunity to extend my reporter's portfolio from the UN summit in September.

I write a regular blog on European Union business, La Treizième Étoile, and can be found on Twitter at @andrewjburgess.

I’m listed on bloggingportal.eu


Post

79% support ‘important’ external EU aid but only 18% are ‘well informed’ about it

Published 04th August 2010 - 5 comments - 1255 views -

The results of a special Eurobarometer survey were released on Monday and contained some rather interesting findings alongside revealing that despite the financial crisis eight out of ten EU citizens (79%) still believe it is important the European Union provides humanitarian aid to countries outside its borders.

The Special Eurobarometer 343 on Humanitarian Aid sought to gauge the EU public’s opinion on the importance of EU humanitarian aid for EU citizens, their awareness of European Union-funded aid projects and actors and whether they perceived any difference in the common or national approaches to providing aid.

The main finding of the survey is that 79% still believe it is important that the European Union continues to provide humanitarian aid to countries outside its borders, such as it did following the earthquake in Haiti back in April.

However, perhaps inevitably, the financial crisis took its toll on the results as the approval rate of EU aid dropped 9% from 88% in July 2006 when the last survey was carried out. This decline indicates a clear and naturally-expected link between the individual financial situations of citizens and the giving of external aid - those who have problems paying their bills expressed less support.

Nationally, a decrease in support was noted in all EU countries with the exception of Cyprus where the approval rate remained at the same high level (95%) as in 2006.

Countries in which the largest fall in support was observed are Latvia (70%, down 18%), Lithuania (68%, down 15%), while in Belgium (71%), Denmark (80%), Poland (79%), Romania (74%) and the UK (75%) support dropped by 14%.

Public awareness still high - but not of the EU's projects...

A Haitian schoolgirl stands alongside some EU-provided aidIn terms of awareness, 85% can name at least one organisation providing humanitarian aid on the ground and 72% can name at least one organisation funding humanitarian assistance, with the organisations most widely-known among EU citizens are the Red Cross and UNICEF.

Another positive finding for the European Commission, albeit bittersweet, is that 18% spontaneously name the EU, the European Commission and/or the Commission's Humanitarian Aid department (ECHO) as an actor funding humanitarian aid.

Although this represents a rise of 11% compared with 2006, it will serve as further proof that more work needs to be done to increase public awareness of its aid work since remember that the EU as a whole – Commission plus member states – is the world's largest humanitarian aid donor, with the Commission alone claiming to have spent on average nearly €800 million annually in the last five years (€931.7m in 2009).

Yet despite the fact that this is not actually the EU's role, 12% spontaneously name the EU, the Commission and/or ECHO as a provider of humanitarian aid on the ground.

Still on the subject of public awareness, 86% said it was important to be informed about EU humanitarian aid activities yet only 18% answered they are “well informed”. This last figure is down from 2006, and perhaps more worryingly 31% of respondents feel "not at all informed".

Aid 'more efficient' through the EU, but not popular in the UK

Kristalina Georgieva, EU Commissioner for Humanitarian Aid, International Cooperation and Crisis Response (Photo: BGNES)When it comes to what level the financial aid should be provided through, a majority of EU citizens (58%), and a relative majority in each individual member state, think aid is more efficient when provided by the EU through the European Commission - something that Kristalina Georgieva, the Commissioner responsible, will certainly be pleased to learn – with only one quarter of those questioned (24%) preferring relief funds to be channelled through member states instead.

The strongest support for a common EU action is found again in Cyprus (71%), Spain and Portugal (both 68%), Belgium (66%), France (65%) as well as in BulgariaGermanyGreece and the Netherlands (all 62%). On the other hand, support for a common action below 50% is found in four Member States: Ireland and Romania (both 43% support) and Lithuania (46%) and the UK (49%).

Amongst all 27 member countries, only a few generally favour a national approach to humanitarian aid, including most notably the UK (32%) where the relevant government department (DFID) has seen its budget exceptionally ring-fenced in order to fulfil its MDG obligations.

The Special Eurobarometer #343 on Humanitarian Aid was carried out in the 27 EU member states and candidate-country Iceland. 26,800 citizens were interviewed face-to-face between February and March 2010. 

The full report is available to download in PDF format from here (EN only, 12mb). Click here to read the questions posed to achieve these results.




Comments

  • Clare Herbert on 05th August 2010:

    I’m surprised at the 79% figure. I thought it would be much lower given the economic crisis. Guess that’s something to be grateful for.


  • Andrew Burgess on 05th August 2010:

    Perhaps so although it is still a drop of nearly 10%. Ironically, I wonder whether the decline would have been greater if the percentage of those ‘well-informed’ about EU aid had been higher…


  • Hieke van der Vaart on 06th August 2010:

    Hi Andrew, relevant post for this platform! To be honest, I am also not fully (understatement) aware of what ECHO is doing exactly. And according to Wikipedia (easier to scan over quickly than their website), in 2006 they had a budget of 671 million euro. Wow.


  • Aija Vanaga on 07th August 2010:

    It is a drop in LV and LT as you see and that is directly because of economical situation!


  • Andrew Burgess on 28th August 2010:

    @Hieke I hope today’s post goes some way to help you understand how ECHO works! See: http://development.thinkaboutit.eu/think3/post/how_echo_delivers_eu_aid_-_a_process_illustrated_in_comic_book_form/


Post your comment

  • Remember my personal information

    Notify me of follow-up comments?

    --- Let's see if you are human ---

    What is missing: North, South, West? Add a questionmark to your answer. (5 character(s) required)